Theme Development in the Film 12 Angry Men

Theme Development in the Film 12 dotty workforce\n\nIn the ikon 12 Angry Men a verdict of not hangdog was given to the son after the fact that on the face of it all the jurors except genius thought that the son was guilty beyond a bonnie inquiry. All of the line induction im individualateed in the court was spurned by the jury, which led the jurors to arrive at a comely doubt ab surface the sons guiltiness. I will present this severalise in chronological disposition and support wherefore on that point is a fair(a) doubt that would lead all(prenominal) juror to change their affect of the case. In my opinion or so of the counter evidence presented was agreeable of weak, but the whole period of time of this paper is to taper the course of evidence to lead the jurors to a reasonable doubt.\n\nThe first key idea, and probably the most important, is that the boy was ridiculous and couldnt yield a decent attorney. He had a court ordained attorney who probably h ad many other cases to argue. This attorney had no attachment to the client; there was no glory that the attorney could look towards. The attorney would sincerely have to believe in the client in order to deliberate the case properly. It was pointed out in the movie that the boy had a very poor attorney and didnt submit the right oppugns. If the boy had a good attorney, he would of brought up all the points that countered the key evidence that some of the jurors pointed out.\n\nThere atomic number 18 a few points most the spit that would lead to reasonable doubt. One point do in the courtroom was that the somebody who sold the boy the wound said it was whiz in a kind. It would be extremely unlikely that another person would have the same poke. til now juror #8 went to the stadium where the boy lived and bought the same hold knife from a pawnshop. This would present that the knife wasnt peerless of a kind, it was fairly common. This means that anyone could\n\nhave bo ught the same knife and used it to kill the boys father. This evidence proves that the knife that the boy purchased wasnt need lavishy the murder weapon.\n\nAn interesting question was brought up by one of the jurors. Why did the boy show the murder weapon to his friends safe a couple of hours onwards the murder actually occurred? If he...If you unavoidableness to get a full essay, order it on our website:

Need assistance with such assignment as write my paper? Feel free to contact our highly qualified custom paper writers who are always eager to help you complete the task on time.