'Relationship Between Critical Thinking and Decision Making Essay\r'

'In the in bodilyd environment lively decisions moldiness be made, somemultiplication quickly, whether because of changes in market conditions, corporate profits, or corporate performances. The decision- admit process is vital to approximate management in nowadays’s work environment. This paper get out examine the relationship between searing cerebration and the decision making process, explain what the textbook authors believe, and continue how both apply to today’s workplace.\r\n deprecative persuasion involves the baron to weigh evidence, examine arguments, and invention rational bases for generally accepted beliefs. In regularise to establish a theoretical basis for canvas decisive thinking, a great quantity of look for has been done. Critical thinking is non only the achievement to reason and construct arguments, but also the ability to examine the reasoning processes involved and being equal to(p) to evaluate their appropriateness and effectivene ss. This â€Å"judgment” aspect is what makes exact thinking more than just problem solving. It is non sufficient to be able to apply problem-solving strategies to a particular problem; a true critical thinker must be able to take on appropriate strategies and even create new ones when necessary.\r\nIn dealing with most complex problems in today’s work environment, there may be more than one good answer to a problem. The question then becomes one of picking the exceed answer; this is called decision-making. Weighing the consequences of these possible solutions based on our understanding of their potential outcomes is the job of the manager. A good manager does not distinguish between â€Å"critical thinking” and â€Å"decision-making” when working. He uses both to arrive at a solution. It is only when analyzing how to come to a particular decision that he must employ critical thinking skills so that he does not get personal prejudices, emotions, or s tress to affect his thinking processes.\r\nAccording to the authors of Whatever It Takes †The Realities of managerial Decision Making, the vi steps to critical thinking and decision making be: â€Å"1) a problem is defined and isolated, 2) discipline is gathered, 3) alternatives are set forth, 4) an end is established, 5) means are created to achieve the end, and 6) a choice is made.” The authors say when use in today’s business environment, the half-dozen steps are mostly ineffective because â€Å"executive decision-making is not a series of single linier acts.” It is the preventive of many other factors (such as murky information, ridiculous information input, and multiple problems intersecting) that makes scientific study of real-life decision-making difficult. (McCall & international ampere; Kaplan, 1990, pg xvii †xviii) Therefore, the authors suggest case study and item dissection of past decisions is the best way to learn how to make futur e decisions.\r\nIn my field of work (currently schooling of t each(prenominal)ing personnel), decisions must be made as to time management, importance of curriculum vs. methodology, and allocation of skill acquisition importance. In addition, two corporations are my superiors; each with different hierarchies as to who tells me which jobs should be done. My decisions, therefore, must not only be politically correct, but must be ones that make the most people happy. When one-third different departments from three different divisions ask me to baffle a project, someone has to be told to wait. It is at times like these that critical thinking becomes important to apologize my decisions when responding to their requests. Critical thinking is used both to confirm my decisions and to clarify my thinking.\r\nReference\r\nMcCall, M. W., & Kaplan, R. E. (1990). Whatever It Takes †The Realities of Managerial Decision Making (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, late Jersey: Prentice Hal l.\r\n'